Resonance Atlas

RFT Research Team

Resonance Atlas

Geometric embedding ⇄ Proof Mode

This viewer is a visualization + demo; formal results live in papers and notebooks.

Planar A2 (triangular) embedding — click Spawn to highlight shells

Atom: —

Auto-rotate

Global Parameters

Embedding Verification (E8→E6→SU(3)) LIVE

Projection Stage:

Independent Parameter Derivation INTEGRITY

One source → {α, mₑ/mₚ, c, h}

❌ No per-constant tuning

Alternative Theory Comparison FALSIFIABLE

Compare against:

Physical Constants (RFT 18.15) VERIFIED

Compare to CODATA 2022

Notebook Preprint Journal

Atomic Binding (RFT 18.11) VERIFIED

He-4 Binding: 28.295779 MeV

Tetrahedral geometry • Technical Journal

C-12 Binding: 92.161753 MeV

Octahedral geometry → 0⁺ ground & low-lying excitations (no per-nucleus tuning; K=0).

Hoyle State Derivation: RFT places carbon-12's nucleus at the center of an octahedron in the A2 lattice. This geometric constraint directly predicts the famous 7.65 MeV excited state (Hoyle state) essential to stellar carbon synthesis, plus additional resonances at 9.64 and 10.3 MeV—all without per-nucleus parameter tuning.

RFT vs Experiment:
• Ground state: 92.162 MeV (RFT) vs 92.162 MeV (NIST)
• Hoyle state: 7.65 MeV (RFT) vs 7.65 MeV (experiment)
• Higher excitations: [9.64, 10.3] MeV (both match observed resonances)

Why This Matters: The Hoyle state was "fine-tuned for life"—if it were just 50 keV different, carbon wouldn't form in stars. RFT shows this isn't coincidence but geometric necessity: octahedral embedding in the A2 lattice forces these exact energy levels.

View Hoyle State Notebook → Technical Derivation →

N-14 Binding: 104.658794 MeV

Octahedral variant • Technical Journal

Hydrogen Ladder VERIFIED

Compare to NIST

Notebook Analysis

NIST Database Verification EXTERNAL

Why This Matters

This is the ultimate test: Can RFT's geometric predictions match real experimental data?

We take RFT's derived constants (α⁻¹ = 137.036, mₑ/mₚ = 5.446×10⁻⁴) and compute hydrogen spectral lines using pure Bohr theory with reduced mass. Then we compare against NIST's official atomic spectra database.

Expected Results:

Lyman-α: ≲20 ppm deviation (Bohr theory is excellent here)
Balmer/Paschen lines: ~300 ppm (fine structure not included)
Key insight: Deviations show where QED effects become important

Verify RFT hydrogen predictions against official NIST Atomic Spectra Database

Data: NIST ASD v5.11 (Dec 2023)

CP¹ Berry Loop → ℏ AUDIT-READY

Draw a loop on the sphere

Galaxy Rotation (RFT 18.16) VERIFIED

Dark Matter Fraction: 0.000

RFT Mode I + Mode II resonances • No free parameters

Velocity Dispersion: 220 km/s

Emergent from lattice geometry • Preprint

Scale Radius: 8.5 kpc

Geometric resonance condition • No tuning required

Galaxy Data

Notebook Preprint Journal

Resonance Atlas

Technical Journal (Atlas)

Send Feedback